S tepping into Jewelry: The Body Transformed, the visitor is greeted by a forest of larger-than-life, vertical vitrines, brilliantly lit and holding displays of equally dazzling and unique jewelry. Individually, each vitrine contains a category of body adornment, with the height of the pedestal set roughly where the object would be worn in relation to the body; anklets near the ground, and necklaces at throat level.
Together, when looking through each transparent vitrine, they visually stack to create an idiosyncratic collection of adornments correlating to the body—one sees a complete collection of bodily ornamentation.
What perhaps makes this newest exhibition of jewelry at The Metropolitan so unique is that the pieces shown are not all of a homogeneous origin, rather, they come from disparate periods and places—and departments. “This exhibition has objects from every single department in the museum, including Musical Instruments,” says exhibition designer Xiaoxi Chen Laurent, who co-designed the show with Alejandro Stein, “the common thread of the exhibition is the body, from head to toe, that traverses different time periods and cultures.”
The contributions from the mentioned Department of Musical Instruments are two intriguing anklets, shown in the first gallery, one from early 19th-century West Africa, the other from the Thailand region at the turn of the millennia. “With the design of the show, we wanted to orient and contextualize the pieces in relation to the body, and give the viewer a unique insight into the different pieces in and of themselves, but also [the ways] that jewelry always activates or transforms the wearer in some way.”
Activation and transformation are the crux of the several thematic divides of the exhibition, which explore jewelry’s role in everything from death to divinity to seduction. In the first section, titled The Divine Body, many of the featured pieces were found buried with their owners, indicative not only of their journey to the next world, but the mythologies they ascribed to. Despite their symbolic meanings, the connection to body, both the wearers and the viewers, is brought to the fore. In one instance, an elaborate set of Egyptian burial jewelry is displayed laid out in proportion to wear it would be worn, a replete set from golden sandals and toe stalls to a scarab beetle necklace.
"There are pieces made of inexpensive materials, like aluminum and straw, as well as more traditional jewelry materials like gold and diamonds—sometimes with the two used together. It really becomes about craftsmanship and attention to detail.”
Bodily imperatives are also invoked through the physical space of the exhibition; funerary jewelry ca. 2600–2500 B.C. from Mesopotamia is displayed in a case that must be approached through a low-ceilinged entrance, alluding to the sense of archeological discovery. Elsewhere in the exhibition, jewelry is shown as worn on truncated, specially milled models cast from Classical sculptures currently in The Metropolitan’s own collection. Rather than simply presenting each object in isolation, there is a constant reminder that each piece was, and made to be, physically worn.
Although there is an abundance of glittering, priceless jewels and metals, “the exhibition also rethinks material,” as Chen Laurent explains. “There are pieces made of inexpensive materials, like aluminum and straw, as well as more traditional jewelry materials like gold and diamonds—sometimes with the two used together. It really becomes about craftsmanship and attention to detail.” This imperative is perhaps most thoroughly explored in the exhibitions final section, The Resplendent Body, which, in part, attempts to “redefine resplendence.” A straw necklace, bracelet, and ring made by the Songhay peoples in Mali in the 20th century is juxtaposed by a 19th century, Indian-made gold, ruby, emerald, diamond and tiger claw necklace close by.
Both are striking in their design and visual allure, and their difference in materials becomes almost secondary. Interpretations of this contrast are most apparent in the contemporary inclusions of the exhibition, such as that by American artist and jeweler Daniel Brush, whose necklace, titled Torque (2010–14), is one of the final pieces in the show. Made predominantly of aluminum, sourced from airplane refrigeration coil manufacturing, it is not until one examines the work closely that the exceptionally intricate engraving and plethora of minute diamonds becomes apparent, which gives the necklace a mysterious “glimmer” rather than ostentatious sparkle—a play on visual impressions and understandings of “preciousness.”
Close examination, and intuitive bodily awareness are at the heart of Jewelry: The Body Transformed. The exhibition offers a comprehensive look and rare insight into the language of jewelry as it is employed across time, place and culture, bringing a singularity of meaning through its one common denominator: the human form.
The exhibition, which closes on 24 February 2019, is not only a chance to view some of the Museum’s most precious objects, but, with jewelry being the oldest and most pervasive art form (even predating cave paintings by several millennia), also an opportunity gain a better understanding of jewelry as a historic, and often transcendent, art form.
Banner image: Pair of Ear Ornaments with Winged Runners, A.D. 400–700. Moche. Peru. Gold, turquoise, sodalite, shell. Gift and Bequest of Alice K. Bache, 1966, 1977. Image courtesy of The Metropolitan Museum of Art.